<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Test Blog &#187; Google-News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/tag/google-news/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://testblog.owt.com</link>
	<description>OWT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:32:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google AdWords Allows Trademarked Terms in PPC Ads</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-allows-trademarked-terms-in-ppc-ads-0361</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-allows-trademarked-terms-in-ppc-ads-0361#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack ODonnell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Trademark-Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark-Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/google-adwords-allows-trademarked-terms-in-ppc-ads-0361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google recently made a significant change in how they treat using trademarked terms in Google AdWords pay-per-click (PPC) advertising ad copy. Prior to this change, unless you had direct written approval from a trademark holder, you were pretty much out of luck when it came to using a trademarked term in your PPC ad copy. Even if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google recently made a significant change in how they treat using trademarked terms in Google AdWords pay-per-click (PPC) advertising ad copy. Prior to this change, unless you had direct written approval from a trademark holder, you were pretty much out of luck when it came to using a trademarked term in your PPC ad copy. Even if you were an <img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://blog.jumpfly.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/google-trademark-policy.jpg" hspace="5" alt="New Google Trademark Policy is in Place" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="New Google Trademark Policy is in Place" />authorized reseller of a specific brand, you still could not use the brand name in your Google AdWords ad copy unless Google had express written permission from the trademark holder on file.</p>
<p>That has all changed. And that is great news for many e-commerce sites that sell branded items. If you are a reseller of goods that have a trademarked brand and if your landing pages give significant focus to the trademarked term, then most Google AdWords ads within the United States will now be approved to run on Google. Also, make sure the trademarked term is used in a text format on your website, as opposed to only flash, so Google can recognize the use of the trademarked term on your page.</p>
<p>The approval process for ads the contain trademarked terms is a separate process at Google AdWords. The ads are first approved to run for all other Google policies, and then they are checked so the use of the trademark and the landing page are in alignment with Google&#8217;s new trademark policy guidelines. This approval process may take a bit longer than the normal time you may have seen in the past for non-trademarked ads, so you will need to give Google AdWords ads containing trademarks a bit more time to show up on Google.</p>
<p>Also, you might notice that these trademark ads may show a status of &#8220;approved-limited.&#8221; This means that Google recognizes that the ad contains a trademarked term and that the advertiser was not given direct permission from the owner of the trademark to actually use it in Google pay per click ad copy. This does NOT mean that the ad will only show for a limited time or in limited regions, but it does mean that Google will check this ad continually to make sure it aligns with the new trademark policy. The content of your landing page will be constantly assessed by Google to make sure the trademark is still featured prominently, so be careful of any changes you make to your landing pages, especially after your trademark ads have been approved and are receiving click traffic.</p>
<p>This change is a real plus for anyone doing <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="Professional PPC Management">PPC management</a> because we all know that if someone is searching for branded items, it certainly is nice to have that trademarked brand name in your ad. If I&#8217;m looking for Lexmark ink, I&#8217;m certainly more inclined to click an ad that has the Lexmark trademarked term in the ad, than on a generic ad that does not.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://jumpfly.com/profiles/Jack-Odonnell.htm" title="More about Jack">More about Jack</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=361&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-allows-trademarked-terms-in-ppc-ads-0361/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google AdWords Trademark Policy Changes &#8211; Hooray!</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-trademark-policy-changes-hooray-0335</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-trademark-policy-changes-hooray-0335#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 03:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikki Kuhlman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark-Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/google-adwords-trademark-policy-changes-hooray-0335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hot off the press from Google is big news that they are changing the way their trademark policy works in the US (view new policy). Under Google&#8217;s existing trademark policy, even if you carried a specific name-brand product, you might not be able to advertise that name in your ad. Meaning, if the BrandX camera [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hot off the press from Google is big news that they are changing the way their trademark policy works in the US (<a target="_blank" href="https://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=145626" title="New Google Trademark Policy">view new policy</a>). Under Google&#8217;s existing trademark policy, even if you carried a specific name-brand product, you might not be able to advertise that <img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://blog.jumpfly.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/google-trademark-policy.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Google Changes Trademark Policy" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Google Changes Trademark Policy" />name in your ad. Meaning, if the BrandX camera company told Google not to let anyone use the BrandX trademark, you couldn&#8217;t actually say you sold BrandX cameras in your ads. Kind of silly. As Google said in their email, &#8220;the ads wouldn&#8217;t be useful since you wouldn&#8217;t know what products are actually being offered.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is especially silly, since any experienced <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="JumpFly PPC Management">pay-per-click (PPC) advertising manager</a> knows that using the keyword that someone searches on in your ad helps increase CTR. I&#8217;ve never understood the fact that a company will allow someone to sell their product, but not allow them to use the product&#8217;s name to advertise it, but it happens all the time.</p>
<p>Under the existing Google Trademark Policy, you can contact the BrandX company and get written approval to use the trademark in your ad. But a lot of times it&#8217;s a time-consuming process &#8211; Google requires very specific language sent in an email to their trademark policy department, you can&#8217;t just use a blanket letter from the company or verbal permission. With some companies it was ridiculous in how long it took to get the required email. The bigger the company, the longer it seemed to take. I had one client that it took a month-and-a-half to get approved by legal &#8211; a four-line sentence took three lawyers and a month-and-a-half of time.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m very glad to see Google has revisited their trademark policy, and the new policy seems pretty reasonable. There&#8217;s some pretty specific guidelines for the trademark use because we wouldn&#8217;t want anyone to be able to use any trademark as they saw fit. Here&#8217;s the new Google Trademark Policy, in a nut shell:</p>
<p>1. You can use a trademarked term at Google AdWords if you use it in a generic or descriptive way and not in reference to that specific trademark. I&#8217;m thinking Kleenex instead of tissue.</p>
<p>2. You can use the trademarked term at Google AdWords if you are a reseller of the trademarked product and your landing page and website clearly demonstrate that you can purchase that trademarked product. Since you are a reseller of BrandX cameras, you could now say that in your ad.</p>
<p>3. You can use the trademarked term at Google AdWords if you are a seller of replacement parts, components or compatible products and your landing page and website clearly demonstrate that you can purchase the trademarked product. If you sold camera bags and lens that were compatible with BrandX cameras, you could say so.</p>
<p>4. You can use the trademarked term at Google AdWords if your site is for &#8220;non-competitive and informative details&#8221;. The &#8220;advertiser may not sell or facilitate the sale&#8221; of a competing product of the trademarked term. Basically, you can&#8217;t advertise on BrandX, take them to an &#8220;informational&#8221; site that sings the praises of BrandY versus BrandX and then try to sell them on BrandY.</p>
<p>Some other things to keep in mind. This new trademark policy is for US ads served on Google.com, and US users for Search and Content networks. Google started accepting new ads with trademarked terms on Friday, May 15th, but will not begin running them until June 15th. If you currently have ads with trademarked terms that are disapproved, you&#8217;ll need to resubmit them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really pleased with this new change to the Google AdWords Trademark Policy. I think Google did a fine job of improving the results a search user gets, while still respecting the rights of the trademark owners. We&#8217;ll see how it plays out, but I think it will benefit everyone involved.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://jumpfly.com/profiles/Nikki-Kuhlman.htm" title="More about Nikki">More about Nikki</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=335&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-trademark-policy-changes-hooray-0335/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Google AdWords User Interface Review</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/new-google-adwords-user-interface-review-0329</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/new-google-adwords-user-interface-review-0329#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikki Kuhlman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWords-User-Interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New-PPC-Features]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/new-google-adwords-user-interface-review-0329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve logged into your Google AdWords account lately, you might have noticed a new link in the upper right corner, New Interface (Beta). If you click on it, you&#8217;re treated to a whole new way of looking at your Google AdWords account. Not every Google AdWords customer has this beta option, but Google is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve logged into your Google AdWords account lately, you might have noticed a new link in the upper right corner, <em>New Interface (Beta)</em>. If you click on it, you&#8217;re treated to a whole new way of looking at your Google AdWords account. Not every Google AdWords customer has this beta option, but Google <img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://blog.jumpfly.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/new-adwords-user-interface.jpg" hspace="5" alt="New Google AdWords User Interface" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="New Google AdWords User Interface" />is slowly rolling the new AdWords User Interface out to more and more customers.</p>
<p>When Google initially introduced the new beta version of the AdWords User Interface (UI), I played around with it a few times in my few client accounts that had the option, but it looks like last week the new AdWords User Interface rolled out to a much wider audience and I decided I better get myself familiar with it. I&#8217;m not going to review every new part of the Adwords UI, but I will highlight a few new features that I&#8217;ve noticed in the past few days.</p>
<p><strong>The Pros of the New Google AdWords Interface:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The &#8220;Tree&#8221; Based Visuals: </strong>I can get to any campaign or AdGroup using the tree interface, instead of going back out to the campaign summary or AdGroup summary.</li>
<li><strong>Nice Graphical Representation: </strong>in each campaign and AdGroup you can view a graph based on criteria like CTR, Conversions, Impressions, CPC and more, for whatever time period you prefer. I love looking at graphs for trends &#8211; is CTR dropping or CPC rising, etc. I used to use this a lot on the account dashboard, but this is even better, and I can choose to hide the graph if I want.</li>
<li><strong>Query Report Built Into the Keyword Tab:</strong> Another new AdWords User Interface feature that I like is the &#8220;Show Query Report&#8221; button within the keyword tab. I can select a few broad and/or phrase match terms, then hit the Show Query Report button and it will give me a list of the search queries that were triggered by the keywords I selected.One caveat is that it appears you have to have quite a few impressions before it will show you data. A lot of the terms I tested kept giving me the error &#8220;Not enough data to show particular queries.&#8221; It still seems a bit &#8220;buggy&#8221;, because a number of times the report would generate partially, but without the search queries, and trying to refresh would cause a bright red error bar to come up. This one is also a Con because once you&#8217;ve generated the list, it&#8217;s a bit kludge to put the actual terms into the AdGroup, but I&#8217;m hoping that will approve.</li>
<li><strong>One last pro: </strong>you can still switch back to the original interface if the new UI gets a bit confusing.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>And now on to my new Google AdWords User Interface Con List:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Ads Showing in the UI May Not Be Active: </strong>this one is a big problem for me, because I almost lost a client last week because of it. When you are in the keyword tab of an AdGroup in the new AdWords User Interface, one ad will be showing on the top left, just like in the original UI. Unfortunately, that ad may not be an active ad (in fact, I have YET to see where the ad that shows is going to an Active ad, unless only active ads are in that AdGroup &#8211; it almost seems to default to a Paused ad which is terribly annoying). I had a client who went into the new interface and was clicking around. He clicked the ad that was showing and was stunned to see it was going to a dead page of his site. He went through a bunch of the AdGroups and saw the same thing, and then called us, completely irate, because this was a change that had happened in January, and that I had told him was taken care of. He demanded a refund of several thousand dollars and was very close to quitting before I got him calmed down enough to understand what was happening and explain to him that the changes were made, and the only ad that was actually active in those AdGroups were all going to a live page in his site.</li>
<li><strong>Quick Add Tool is Missing: </strong>one of my favorite tools in the original interface is on the keyword tab and it&#8217;s the Quick Add link. Click it and Google lets you manually enter your keywords, AND generates a very specific list of keywords that you are missing that are all based around the existing keywords in that AdGroup. I use it a lot to see what keywords I might be missing in an AdGroup AND what negatives I should include. The Keyword Tool just generates too much &#8220;noise&#8221; to be used effectively in this same manner. And now it&#8217;s missing in the new AdWords User Interface, and the Show Query Report is not an effective substitute.</li>
<li><strong>Show Query Report:</strong> it&#8217;s on my pro list too, but most of the time it either doesn&#8217;t give results because it doesn&#8217;t have enough data or it keeps having errors.</li>
<li><strong>The MCC Drop-Down List is Not Alphabetical: </strong>this is a con for <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="JumpFly PPC Management">PPC management agencies</a> like ourselves who use an MCC to manage our clients &#8211; the Drop-Down Client list isn&#8217;t alphabetical, so it can be hard to find a client in the list.</li>
<li><strong>The Next/Previous Links on the AdGroup Level Are Gone: </strong>in the original interface, I could sort my AdGroups by some criteria, like Cost or Impressions, and go into the first one, then hit the next link to move to the next one. That link is gone, so I have to keep going back to the Campaign level to see what the next AdGroup is that I need to go into.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now this certainly isn&#8217;t a comprehensive list of Pros and Cons but just the first ones that have come to me over the last four or five days of continually using the new AdWords User interface. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll have plenty more in the days and weeks to come. There&#8217;s no set switch date that I could find when they are moving from Beta to the new UI permanently, but I recommend getting used to it now, when you still have the ability to switch back and forth between the beta and original Google AdWords User Interface.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://jumpfly.com/profiles/Nikki-Kuhlman.htm" title="More about Nikki">More about Nikki</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=329&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/new-google-adwords-user-interface-review-0329/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube Sponsored Videos Now Available</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/youtube-sponsored-videos-now-available-0263</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/youtube-sponsored-videos-now-available-0263#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Garlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New-PPC-Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youtube-Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/youtube-sponsored-videos-now-available-0263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now you can reach YouTube&#8217;s 74 million U.S. users with targeted pay-per-click (PPC) video ads. This recently launched YouTube advertising interface links directly to your Google AdWords Account for billing and reporting. In order to participate in this advertising medium, businesses need to have three things:
1) A company YouTube &#8220;Channel&#8221;
2) Video ad/ads production
3) YouTube campaign [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you can reach <a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com" title="YouTube">YouTube&#8217;s</a> 74 million U.S. users with targeted pay-per-click (PPC) <a target="_blank" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/promote-your-video-with-youtube.html" title="Google Blog About YouTube Sponsored Videos">video ads</a>. This recently launched YouTube advertising interface links directly to your Google AdWords Account for billing and reporting. In order to participate in this advertising medium, businesses need to have three things:<img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://blog.jumpfly.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/youtube-ads.jpg" hspace="5" alt="YouTube Sponsored Videos" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="YouTube Sponsored Videos" /></p>
<p>1) A company YouTube &#8220;Channel&#8221;<br />
2) Video ad/ads production<br />
3) YouTube campaign development, implementation &amp; management</p>
<p>The newness of this platform provides early adopters an exciting opportunity to capitalize on YouTube’s massive user population as well as the current lack of advertisers and resulting very low cost-per-clicks (CPCs).</p>
<p>Founded in February 2005, YouTube was purchased by Google in November 2006 for $1.65 billion in stock roughly 1-½ years later. Today, YouTube is the #2 search engine and the #3 most visited website in the world. YouTube serves close to 1 billion videos every day and its users upload 13 hours of video every minute. According to HitWise, YouTube&#8217;s market share in the U.S. video sector is 73.18%.</p>
<p>Right now, advertisers can get started with really low CPCs before the advertising at YouTube gets competitive. I created a simple campaign for <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="JumpFly PPC Management">JumpFly</a> as a test and was able to attain impressive first page results for as little as $0.15 per click. As YouTube’s growth continues and video becomes more mainstream, YouTube will likely represent a valuable advertising avenue for many advertisers who properly go after this new marketplace. Learn more about <a target="_blank" href="https://ads.youtube.com/" title="YouTube Sponsored Videos Login">YouTube Sponsored Videos</a> or consider having a professional <a target="_blank" href="http://www.jumpfly.com/services.htm" title="JumpFly PPC Services">PPC Management firm</a> assist you in developing your YouTube Sponsored Video campaign.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://jumpfly.com/profiles/Brad-Garlin.htm" title="More About Brad">More about Brad</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.youtube.com/user/JumpFlyInc" title="JumpFly YouTube Channel">JumpFly YouTube Channel</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=263&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/youtube-sponsored-videos-now-available-0263/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Updates AdWords Alcohol Policy</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-updates-adwords-alcohol-policy-0243</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-updates-adwords-alcohol-policy-0243#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Tatge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol-Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/google-updates-adwords-alcohol-policy-0243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this fall, Google changed their alcohol policy regarding beer. For the first time, they allowed the U.S. AdWords advertisement of beer for sale. Monday, Google announced another update to the AdWords alcohol policy. Starting this week, Google now allows the advertisement of hard alcohol and liqueurs that target the U.S.
This is good news to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this fall, Google changed their alcohol policy regarding beer. For the first time, they allowed the U.S. AdWords advertisement of beer for sale. Monday, Google announced another update to the <a target="_blank" href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/static.py?page=guidelines.cs&amp;topic=9271&amp;subtopic=9279&amp;answer=47212" title="Google AdWords Advertising Policies">AdWords alcohol policy</a>. Starting this week, <a target="_blank" href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/12/update-to-adwords-alcohol-policy.html" title="Updated AdWords Alcohol Policy">Google now allows the advertisement of hard alcohol and liqueurs</a> that target the U.S.<img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://blog.jumpfly.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/alcohol-permitted.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Alcohol Permitted" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Alcohol Permitted" /></p>
<p>This is good news to hard alcohol and beer manufacturers who can now take advantage of the increased holiday traffic, as well as the new opportunities for branding in the online marketplace.</p>
<p>The biggest difference between the ability to market beer and that of hard alcohol, is that beer is allowed to be marketed for sale through PPC advertising, while hard alcohol and liqueurs must &#8220;promote the information about the hard alcohol and liqueur that their websites contain.&#8221; Any ads that directly promote the actual sale of hard alcohol or liqueur are still not allowed on AdWords. This means that the sale of hard alcohol and liqueur cannot be promoted in your Google AdWords ad copy or be the purpose of your website. Ads for the purpose of branding hard alcohol and liqueur are absolutely allowed to target the U.S.</p>
<p>In other words, you can sell beer with Google AdWords, however you can only brand or use the promotion of hard alcohol and liqueur for non-sales related websites.</p>
<p>Its important to note that Google considers beer, wine, champagne, hard alcohol, and liqueur to be products intended for sale to, and consumption by, adults. Therefore, any ads promoting these products will be given a <a target="_blank" href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=69787&amp;topic=10614" title="Google AdWords Family Status Info">Non-Family Safe</a> status. From a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="JumpFly PPC Management">PPC management</a> aspect, this means that anybody who has activated their &#8220;Google SafeSearch filter&#8221; will not be able to see these ads.</p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=243&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-updates-adwords-alcohol-policy-0243/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the party over for Google? Trouble at Google AdWords?</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/is-the-party-over-for-google-trouble-at-google-adwords-0227</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/is-the-party-over-for-google-trouble-at-google-adwords-0227#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Garlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/is-the-party-over-for-google-trouble-at-google-adwords-0227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has the faltering economy finally caught up with Google and their lucrative AdWords platform?
Perhaps in the short-term, according to Merriman Curhan Ford analyst Richard Fetyko. Yesterday, Fetyko issued a release via Barrons stating, &#8220;Based on our checks, the decline in consumer and business purchasing is having a dampening effect on search-engine marketing (SEM) &#8212; keyword [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has the faltering economy finally caught up with Google and their lucrative AdWords platform?</p>
<p>Perhaps in the short-term, according to Merriman Curhan Ford analyst Richard Fetyko. Yesterday, Fetyko issued a release via Barrons stating, &#8220;Based on our checks, the decline in consumer and business purchasing is having a dampening effect on search-engine mar<img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://blog.jumpfly.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/partyover.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Is the Party Over for Google?" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Is the Party Over for Google?" />keting (SEM) &#8212; keyword prices are down 5%-30% from the third-quarter of 2008, traffic to ecommerce sites is also down year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter, and click-through-rates on ad listings are declining as well. SEM is expected to be among the last places to see cuts, and we are there now. Advertisers are adjusting their keyword buys to protect their margins and returns on investment, which are under pressure as sales-conversion rates and average order value dropped, based on our checks. Google&#8217;s paid-click volume is also under pressure. Since consumers and businesses have reined in their spending, they are searching for fewer commercial items and are clicking on fewer ads (click-through rates dropped), which translates into slower growth in paid-clicks volume (key revenue driver). Weakness has also spread overseas. Domestic growth has decelerated in 2008, and we expect international regions to slow in the fourth-quarter of 2008 and 2009 as well. U.K. ad revenue was flat for the last three quarters, and the rest of Europe and Asia are seeing cutbacks in ad budgets as well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, various research agencies are reducing their projections for online advertising growth going forward. Just last week, marketing research firm eMarketer reduced estimates for U.S. Internet advertising to $25.7 billion for next year, about $2.7 billion less than a forecast from just three months ago, but still a 9% increase over this year. EMarketer predicts U.S. search ads will generate $12.3 billion next year and that &#8220;display ads&#8221; will rise nearly 7% next year to $4.9 billion (less than the 14% growth previously suggested). Considering we&#8217;re in the midst of the worst financial crisis since the 1930s, I would say that any growth at all is pretty good! The reason for continued growth in PPC advertising despite this crisis is because it works.</p>
<p>While &#8220;decelerating growth&#8221; may be a sobering reality for Google, it will not bring them to their knees. In the near term, Google may have to make some adjustments, but they appear incredibly well positioned to potentially dominate multiple marketplaces going forward, including organic search, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="Sponsored Search Advertising Specialists">sponsored search advertising</a>, online video &amp; the wireless market. Organic search, PPC advertising and online video (via YouTube) are already in the bag, at least for now, and Google&#8217;s wireless <a target="_blank" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/first-android-powered-phone.html" title="Google Blog About the First Android-powered Phone">Android platform</a> is new but already creating a lot of buzz. Actually, I personally think that what Google has already accomplished is amazing and I look forward to witnessing their future innovations. They always seem to be one step ahead of the competition.</p>
<p><strong>Holiday Reminder</strong>- The busiest shopping day of the year, Black Friday (this Friday) is followed by the biggest online shopping day of the year, <a target="_blank" href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/11/cyber-monday-is-next-monday.html" title="Google's Cyber Monday Tips">Cyber Monday</a> (next Monday). Happy Thanksgiving.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.jumpfly.com/profiles/brad-garlin.htm" title="More about Brad">More about Brad</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=227&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/is-the-party-over-for-google-trouble-at-google-adwords-0227/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Starting New PPC Advertising Campaigns &#8211; Begin With Google AdWords</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/starting-new-ppc-advertising-campaigns-begin-with-google-adwords-0225</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/starting-new-ppc-advertising-campaigns-begin-with-google-adwords-0225#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack ODonnell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!-News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/starting-new-ppc-advertising-campaigns-begin-with-google-adwords-0225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New clients will often ask us here at JumpFly which search engine is the best to begin pay-per-click (PPC) advertising on. Clearly, Google is the first obvious choice if you are looking for the greatest volume of traffic. According to the latest numbers from Hitwise, Google received 71.7% of U.S. search queries in October 2008. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New clients will often ask us here at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="JumpFly PPC Management">JumpFly</a> which search engine is the best to begin pay-per-click (PPC) advertising on. Clearly, Google is the first obvious choice if you are looking for the greatest volume of traffic. According to the latest numbers from <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hitwise.com/press-center/hitwiseHS2004/google-nears-searches-oct.php" title="Search Query Data From Hitwise">Hitwise</a>, Google received 71.7% of U.S. search queries in October <img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://blog.jumpfly.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/where-to-start.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Where to Start PPC Advertising" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Where to Start PPC Advertising" />2008. That&#8217;s a huge chunk of online traffic and search volume moving through the Google search box. If you only had one search engine to choose, there is no question that you should choose Google.</p>
<p>Yahoo search volume is dropping consistently, down from nearly 22% in October 2007 to below 18% for October 2008. MSN took a drop from last year as well in their search volume, but it seems to be holding in the mid 5% range from month to month now. So that does beg the question, is it even worth running PPC campaigns on Yahoo and MSN? Clearly, there is some volume to be had on both of those search networks, so they definitely have some value to some advertisers. If your budget is tight, though, and you are testing the PPC waters, I would suggest starting on Google only and then see where you can go from there.</p>
<p>Another strategy to consider for Yahoo and MSN, which we have implemented and seen success with, is to start out strong on Google for a month or two and then only move your best performers over to Yahoo and MSN. Since Google does bring in the most volume by a large margin, their search platform can really give you a good indicator as to whether a certain product, or a certain groups of keywords, or specific ad copy, will bring you the ROI you are looking for. It isn&#8217;t always an apples to apples comparison, and what works on Google does not necessarily always work on Yahoo or MSN, but you can certainly get some strong indicators as to what might work on the other engines by analyzing what is working on Google first.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://jumpfly.com/profiles/Jack-Odonnell.htm" title="Learn More About Jack">Learn more about Jack</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=225&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/starting-new-ppc-advertising-campaigns-begin-with-google-adwords-0225/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of Phishing Emails &#8211; PPC Advertiser Alert</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/beware-of-phishing-emails-ppc-advertiser-alert-0214</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/beware-of-phishing-emails-ppc-advertiser-alert-0214#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nikki Kuhlman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email_phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing_scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/beware-of-phishing-emails-ppc-advertiser-alert-0214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just last week one of my pay-per-click (PPC) advertising clients got hit by fraudulent Google activity; someone logged into their Google AdWords account, set up a new campaign and in a matter of 12 hours, spent $26,000. Google contacted us about the activity, and my client is not liable for the amount spent, but it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just last week one of my pay-per-click (PPC) advertising clients got hit by fraudulent Google activity; someone logged into their Google AdWords account, set up a new campaign and in a matter of 12 hours, spent $26,000. Google contacted us about the activity, and my client is not liable for the amount spent, but it&#8217;s certainly made for quite a bit of frustration, as their AdWords account is off and will be off indefinitely until the write-off gets posted to their account.<img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.jumpfly.com/images/phishing.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Beware of Phishing" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Beware of Phishing" /></p>
<p><strong>How did this happen and how can you prevent it from happening to you?</strong></p>
<p>While we&#8217;re not 100% positive how exactly the perpetrators got a hold of the client&#8217;s Google AdWords login and password in this particular case, here&#8217;s how you can protect yourself:</p>
<p>1. <strong>Don&#8217;t Get Caught by Phishing Emails</strong> (three examples of Phishing emails are at the bottom of this Blog): if you get an email that looks like it&#8217;s from Google, and requests that you click a link within the email to login, DO NOT click the link. Phishing emails are emails that are web forgery designed to trick you into sharing logins, passwords, personal or financial information. They look official, but are devious. As a general rule, you should never click a link within an email and login to your account. Always open a browser window and type in the desired URL or use bookmarks.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Change your password:</strong> if you&#8217;ve never changed your password before, now is a great time. I know it&#8217;s difficult to remember all those passwords, but it&#8217;s a better alternative to getting scammed. We&#8217;ve started changing our passwords here at JumpFly on a monthly basis.</p>
<p>3. <strong>Hire an Experienced <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="JumpFly PPC Management">PPC Management Company</a></strong>: then you can forward any emails that look like they are from Google AdWords, Yahoo Search Marketing or Microsoft adCenter to your account manager and not have to deal with it at all.</p>
<p>Three Google Phishing Emails that are making the rounds:</p>
<p>~~~~~~ Phishing Scam Email #1 &#8211; Start ~~~~~~<br />
From: adwords-noreply@google.com<br />
Subject: Your AdWords Google Account is stopped</p>
<p>This message was sent from a notification-only email address that does not accept incoming email. Please do not reply to this message.</p>
<p>Dear Google AdWords Customer,</p>
<p>Please sign in to your account at http://adwords.google.com/select/login , and update your billing information.</p>
<p>Your account will be reactivated as soon as you update your payment information.</p>
<p>Your ads will show immediately if you decide to pay for clicks via credit or debit card. If you decide to pay by direct debit, we may need to receive your signed debit authorization before your ads start running, depending on your location.</p>
<p>If you choose bank transfer, your ads will show as soon as we receive your first payment.</p>
<p>We look forward to providing you with the most effective advertising available.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>The Google AdWords Team<br />
~~~~~ Phishing Scam Email #1 &#8211; End ~~~~~</p>
<p>~~~~~ Phishing Scam Email #2 &#8211; Start ~~~~~</p>
<p>From: reactivation@google.com<br />
Subject: The Google AdWords Team request you to update your<br />
billing information</p>
<p>Dear Google AdWords Customer,</p>
<p>Your ads have stopped running because we were unable to process your billing information. We will reactivate you account after you update your billing information. In order to reactivate your account, please sign it to your account at http://adwordsgoogle.com/select/login, and update your billing information. Once your account is reactivated and your billing information has been processed, any your ads and campaigns can begin running immediately on Google.</p>
<p>You will not be asked to submit your billing information every time you create a new ad or campaign. If your payment has been declined and you&#8217;d like to resubmit the same credit card information, you may also do so by clicking the Retry card button on your Billing Preferences page. After updating your credit card information (regardless of whether or not you use a different card), it can take up to 24 hours before your ads start running again. You also have the option of providing a backup credit card to help ensure that your ads run continuously in the case that your primary payment method fails.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>The Google AdWords Team<br />
~~~~~ Phishing Scam Email #2 &#8211; End ~~~~~</p>
<p>~~~~~ Phishing Scam Email #3 &#8211; Start ~~~~~<br />
From: reactivation@google.com<br />
Subject: Our programme terms have changed.</p>
<p>Dear AdWords Customer,</p>
<p>As part of our ongoing efforts to improve the Google AdWords programme for advertisers and users, we have updated our Terms and Conditions.</p>
<p>Please review the new Terms and Conditions below, then indicate your acceptance.</p>
<p>Yes, I accept the Terms and Conditions. [LINK]</p>
<p>This message was sent from a notification-only email address that does not accept incoming email. Please do not reply to this message.</p>
<p>~~~~~ Phishing Scam Email #3 &#8211; End ~~~~~</p>
<p>More about <a target="_blank" href="http://jumpfly.com/profiles/Nikki-Kuhlman.htm" title="View Profile for Nikki">Nikki</a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/04/how-to-avoid-getting-hooked.html" title="Google's Defense Against Phishing">More from Google about avoiding phishing</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=214&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/beware-of-phishing-emails-ppc-advertiser-alert-0214/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google AdWords Ends Agreement With Yahoo!</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-ends-agreement-with-yahoo-0212</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-ends-agreement-with-yahoo-0212#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Garlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Yahoo!-Partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!-Search-Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/google-adwords-ends-agreement-with-yahoo-0212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A blog entry released earlier today (view here) by David Drummond, Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer with Google, publicly announced Google&#8217;s decision to walk away from a planned partnership with Yahoo! (view details about the agreement here). This is not a huge surprise, as the deal was recently delayed, but it is now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A blog entry released earlier today (<a target="_blank" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/ending-our-agreement-with-yahoo.html" title="Google's Announcement to End Yahoo! Deal">view here</a>) by David Drummond, Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer with Google, publicly announced Google&#8217;s decision to walk away from a planned partnership with Yahoo! (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/yahoogooglefacts/" title="Google-Yahoo! Advertising Agreement">view details about the agreement here</a>). This is not a huge surprise, as the deal was <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/google-news-google-yahoo-deal-delay-0190" title="Google - Yahoo! Deal Delayed">recently delayed</a>, but it is now official.<img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.jumpfly.com/images/no-deal.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Google Ends Yahoo! Partnership" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Google Ends Yahoo! Partnership" /></p>
<p>The blog states, &#8220;&#8230; after four months of review, including discussions of various possible changes to the agreement, it&#8217;s clear that government regulators and some advertisers continue to have concerns about the agreement. Pressing ahead risked not only a protracted legal battle but also damage to relationships with valued partners. That wouldn&#8217;t have been in the long-term interests of Google or our users, so we have decided to end the agreement.&#8221;</p>
<p>In response, Yahoo! said it was disappointed by Google&#8217;s decision and maintained that the abandoned partnership would have been beneficial for everyone. Yahoo! just lost out on hundreds of millions of dollars in additional annual revenue that would have resulted from the deal. Yahoo!&#8217;s statement also said that they are, &#8220;disappointed that Google has elected to withdraw from the agreement rather than defend it in court.&#8221;</p>
<p>Several analysts speculate that losing the Google deal will make Yahoo! more likely to revisit a possible deal with, or outright buyout from Microsoft. Details of the Google-Yahoo! partnership put up significant barriers to a Microsoft buyout &#8211; barriers that no longer remain. Yahoo!&#8217;s stock price finished up today despite the DOW plunging 486 points, likely due to investor speculation and hopes for renewed buyout potential. We&#8217;ll see how this plays out, but I&#8217;m confident that Microsoft execs are talking about this situation as I type. Tic toc. Tic toc. Time will tell if Microsoft will come back to the table. In the meantime, Google continues to expand their search dominance.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.jumpfly.com/profiles/brad-garlin.htm" title="Profile for Brad Garlin">Learn about Brad</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=212&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-ends-agreement-with-yahoo-0212/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New View into Google AdWords Statistics &#8211; Search Partner Data Revealed</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/new-view-into-google-adwords-statistics-search-partner-data-revealed-0204</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/new-view-into-google-adwords-statistics-search-partner-data-revealed-0204#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack ODonnell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Search-Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/new-view-into-google-adwords-statistics-search-partner-data-revealed-0204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google AdWords Search Partners Prove Valuable
You may have noticed some new choices you now have on the Google AdWords Campaign Summary screen.  On the right side of the summary screen, there are numerous new options you have in the Statistics drop down box.  You can now view your pay-per-click (PPC) traffic data in several different ways.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google AdWords Search Partners Prove Valuable</strong></p>
<p>You may have noticed some <a target="_blank" href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/10/separate-metrics-for-google-and-search.html" title="Separate Metrics for Google and Search Partners Now Available">new choices</a> you now have on the Google AdWords Campaign Summary screen.  On the right side of the summary screen, there are numerous new options you have in the Statistics drop down box.  You can now view your pay-per-click (PPC) traffic data in several different ways.  You can isolate Google search traffic from the rest of the Google search partner network, giving you an immediate insight into where you are getting the <img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.jumpfly.com/images/search-partners-work.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Google Search Partners Prove Valuable" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Google Search Partner Metrics Revealed" />best/most converting traffic.  Some of these search partners include AOL, Earthlink, Shopping.com, AT&amp;T Worldnet and Ask.com</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to report that the Google search partner network is indeed delivering some very solid converting traffic.  Some of our clients here at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="JumpFly PPC Management">JumpFly</a> have expressed skepticism about the value of the traffic from those non-Google sites and have chosen to run on Google only, but throughout all the accounts I have looked at recently I am definitely seeing tremendous value in the search partner network.  Some of the search partner data is revealing that they can sometimes outperform Google itself.  If you have not tried running on the search partner network due to concerns about its value, now is the time for you to include those partners and give them a chance. </p>
<p>One thing you cannot do, however, is bid separately for Google and the search partner network.  Keywords and Ad Groups still retain the same bid regardless of this new insight into how each is performing.  So, you may see that the search partner network is delivering conversions at twice the cost of Google but you will not be able to adjust bids for just the search partner network.  Conversely, you might see that the search partner network is delivering conversions at half the cost but you cannot get more aggressive on just the search partners because your bid is still tied to both Google and the search partners.  I&#8217;m pretty certain this will change in the future, but for now you can just look at the data and hope that change comes sooner rather than later.</p>
<p>Learn more about <a target="_blank" href="http://jumpfly.com/profiles/Jack-Odonnell.htm" title="Profile for Jack O'Donnell">Jack</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=204&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/new-view-into-google-adwords-statistics-search-partner-data-revealed-0204/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google AdWords Search Partners &#8211; Separate Metrics for Google and Search Partners Now Available</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-search-partners-separate-metrics-for-google-and-search-partners-now-available-0202</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-search-partners-separate-metrics-for-google-and-search-partners-now-available-0202#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Tatge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Search-Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/google-adwords-search-partners-separate-metrics-for-google-and-search-partners-now-available-0202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have recently logged into your Google AdWords account you may have noticed new data available. There are now separate metrics available for Google and search partners, as well as the content network. At last we can finally see the performance differences between these various sources of traffic instead of the previously combined summary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have recently logged into your Google AdWords account you may have noticed new data available. There are now <a target="_blank" href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/10/separate-metrics-for-google-and-search.html" title="Separate Metrics for Google and Search Partners Now Available">separate metrics available for Google and search partners</a>, as well as the content network. At last we can finally see the performance differences between these various sources of traffic instead of the previously combined summary of Google and the search partners.<img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.jumpfly.com/images/google-search-partner-data.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Google Search Partner Metrics Revealed" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Google Search Partner Metrics Revealed" /></p>
<p>In the Campaign Summary and AdGroup view you will see a new drop down menu labeled &#8220;Statistics.&#8221;  There are several combinations of views including the summary view, split views, and individual views. For example, if you were to choose &#8220;Split: Google search/search partners/content network,&#8221; you will now see three rows of data representing the different performance metrics from all 3 sources of traffic.</p>
<p>When it comes to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.jumpfly.com" title="JumpFly PPC Management">PPC management</a>, I love data, and this new data from the search partners is a welcome addition to the AdWords interface.</p>
<p>Comparing this data among the different accounts that I manage has shown a wide variation of results; with some accounts generating substantially lower cost per conversions from the search partner network and others doing just the opposite. None of my accounts have shown horrible results from the search partners; certainly I haven&#8217;t seen any red flags.</p>
<p>The biggest problem here is that there really isn&#8217;t much you can do with this data other than to use it to help decide to turn on or off the search partners. At this time, it is still impossible to realistically separate the budgets and bids between Google and the search partners. Just like your first high school party, if you want to go, big brother has to tag along.</p>
<p>While this new data is a definite step forward, I would still love to be able to separate my budgets and bids between Google and the search partners. There are a lot of good reasons to do so, and this new data supports this rationality even further. Let&#8217;s face it, you don&#8217;t always want big brother to tag along to the party.</p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=202&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-adwords-search-partners-separate-metrics-for-google-and-search-partners-now-available-0202/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Earnings Indicate Strength in PPC Advertising</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-earnings-indicate-strength-in-ppc-advertising-0198</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-earnings-indicate-strength-in-ppc-advertising-0198#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Garlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/google-earnings-indicate-strength-in-ppc-advertising-0198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The state of the PPC advertising industry according to Google earnings
In a word, the PPC industry continues to look healthy.
After the closing bell today, Google, Inc. reported their most recent quarter&#8217;s earnings, including an impressive profit increase of 26% compared to the same quarter last year. This is pretty impressive growth, especially considering just about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The state of the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="JumpFly PPC Management">PPC advertising</a> industry according to Google earnings</p>
<p>In a word, the PPC industry continues to look healthy.</p>
<p>After the closing bell today, Google, Inc. reported their most recent quarter&#8217;s earnings, including an <img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.jumpfly.com/images/Google-Earnings.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Google Earnings Indicate PPC Strength" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Google Earnings Indicate PPC Strength" />impressive profit increase of 26% compared to the same quarter last year. This is pretty impressive growth, especially considering just about every other company seems to be slowing down.</p>
<p>Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt said that the company experienced &#8220;revenue growth across all of our major geographies thanks to the underlying strength of our core search and ads business.&#8221; <br />
Google officially started generating more than half of its revenue from international markets. <br />
 <br />
In regards to their paid click revenue, Google said Thursday that the number of paid clicks rose 4% from the previous quarter, and 18% compared with the same period a year earlier. Though the economy is hurting, people continue to search the web and click sponsored results with increasing regularity.</p>
<p>Google continues to grow its workforce, adding another 519 people during the quarter, though this is down from an increase of 2,130 employees at the same time last year. The company now has 20,123 employees.<br />
We&#8217;ll see what Yahoo! has to say when they announce their quarterly earnings early next week.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://jumpfly.com/profiles/Brad-Garlin.htm" title="Profile for Brad Garlin">More about Brad</a></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://blog.jumpfly.com/tags/google-news/" title="Google News">View more Google News articles from JumpFly</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=198&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-earnings-indicate-strength-in-ppc-advertising-0198/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update Old AdWords Logins to Google Account Logins</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/update-old-adwords-logins-to-google-account-logins-0196</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/update-old-adwords-logins-to-google-account-logins-0196#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Tatge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWords-Login]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Login]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/update-old-adwords-logins-to-google-account-logins-0196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google gave a heads-up to AdWords users who are still using their old logins and have not yet updated to the free Google account logins. On November 1st, Google will disable any login that is still using the older Adwords login and hasn&#8217;t updated to the new system.
Google account logins were introduced in 2005. They [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google gave a heads-up to AdWords users who are still using their old logins and have not yet updated to the free Google account logins. On November 1st, Google will disable any login that is still using the older Adwords login and hasn&#8217;t updated to the new syste<img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.JumpFly.com/images/Update-AdWords-Logins.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Update Old Google AdWords Logins" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Update Old Google AdWords Logins" />m.</p>
<p>Google account logins were introduced in 2005. They let you use a single email and password to access the many Google services available like AdWords, Gmail, Google Checkout, etc. Until now, switching an AdWords account to a Google Account was completely optional. For security reasons, Google is now requiring that everyone use a Google Account login for their accounts.</p>
<p>To update your old AdWords login you basically have several options available that depend on if you manage your AdWords account yourself and if you already use other Google services. Both options require that you first login to your Google AdWords account. You will most likely be automatically directed to their update wizard. If not, simply click the &#8220;Update your login to a Google Account&#8221; link which is located at the top of the page. There will be a short introduction to read, and then click &#8220;Continue.&#8221; Next, follow the steps that best relate to your situation and remember to pick a new unique password at the end.</p>
<p>For more detailed step by step information, Google provides a great help page on <a target="_blank" href="https://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=27686&amp;hl=en" title="Update Your AdWords Login">how to update your AdWords login</a>. If concerned, contact a qualified <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="JumpFly PPC Management">Google AdWords management company</a>.</p>
<p>Additionally, it is always a good idea to <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/ppc-advertising-stop-reading-and-change-your-passwords-0183" title="Change Your Passwords">regularly change your passwords</a> for security protection. View a recent article by Nikki Kuhlman discussing <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/ppc-advertising-phishing-email-scam-alert-054" title="Google AdWords Phishing Email Alert">common phishing email scams</a>.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://blog.jumpfly.com/tags/google-adwords/" title="Google AdWords Articles">View more Google AdWords articles</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=196&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/update-old-adwords-logins-to-google-account-logins-0196/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Financial Crisis and Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/financial-crisis-and-internet-marketing-0192</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/financial-crisis-and-internet-marketing-0192#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Garlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial-Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/financial-crisis-and-internet-marketing-0192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Financial Crisis and Internet Marketing
The widely followed Dow Jones Industrials slid another 508 points yesterday, closing at 9,447. Yikes, 19 more days like that and the stock market will be gone! For the sake of our economy and everyone in this country, things will improve, and the sooner the better. I fear the potential fall-out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Financial Crisis and Internet Marketing</strong></p>
<p>The widely followed Dow Jones Industrials slid another 508 points yesterday, closing at 9,447. Yikes, 19 more days like that and the stock market will be gone! For the sake of our economy and everyone in this country, things will improve, and the sooner the better. I fear the potential fall-out from what has already happened in the stock market is just beginning to be realized and further far-reaching consequences are likely to develop. Already, the financial crisis here at home has spread overseas as international banks <img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.jumpfly.com/images/financial-crisis.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Financial Crisis and Internet Marketing" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Financial Crisis and Internet Marketing" />and markets are now in a state of crisis as well. In fact, global markets lost $8.1 trillion in value over the past 3 months. Based on these unsettling facts, the question for today is, how will this financial crisis impact Internet marketing, and more specifically pay-per-click (PPC) advertising? For the sake of this article, I&#8217;m going to assume the stock market does not remain on its current path to zero. If it does, we&#8217;ll all have much more serious things to worry about than Internet advertising.</p>
<p>Per a previous <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/ppc-advertising-news-crashing-economy-google-shows-search-volume-data-091" title="PPC Advertising News">PPC advertising news review</a> I wrote back in July, the PPC Economy still appears stable, at least for now. Recent surveys suggest that U.S. online advertising is still slated to grow 22.7% in 2008, though this is less than the 32.7% growth previously anticipated. I also referenced Henry Blodget, co-founder of <a target="_blank" href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/" title="Silicon Alley Insider">Silicon Alley Insider</a> and someone whose opinion I greatly respect. He stated that, “new or developing media–those that still are growing more quickly than advertising expenditures as a whole–exhibit fewer recessionary effects than traditional media. More specifically, advertising spending on “new media” does not decline before, during, or after recessions, it simply grows less quickly than during normal years. This trend was clearly visible in the growth of television advertising during the recessions of the 1950s and 1960s, and in the growth of cable advertising during the 1990s.” In fact, Hal Varian, Google’s chief economist, agreed, telling analysts that, “During periods of slow economic growth, the last thing an advertiser wants to cut is spending on search-based advertising.”</p>
<p>However, right now, no companies seem to be safe. Just this week, Internet giant eBay  shed 10% of its workforce, meaning 1,600 more people are now seeking employment. They&#8217;re far from alone as job loss continues at an alarming rate. Earlier this month, the U.S. Labor Department reported the economy lost another 159,000 jobs in September, far more than the 100,000 lost jobs economists were expecting. The economy has now lost 760,000 jobs since January. These numbers cast a harsh reality on the tragic state of our economy.</p>
<p>To examine if PPC advertising is suffering, let&#8217;s take a closer look at Google&#8217;s last quarterly earnings release. Google earns the vast majority of their revenue from their Google AdWords search-marketing program:</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/revenues_q208.html" title="Google 2nd Quarter 2008 Earnings">Google reported</a> revenues of $5.37 billion for the last quarter, an increase of 39% compared to the same quarter a year earlier. This indicates that advertisers are still willing to shell out money to Google, though at a slower growth rate than the year prior.</p>
<p>Here at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.JumpFly.com" title="JumpFly PPC Management">JumpFly</a>, where all we do is setup and manage PPC accounts, we have fortunately not yet witnessed any recognizable slow down in new or existing clients as a result of current economic conditions. From our eyes, it appears that the search engine marketing industry remains strong &#8211; increasingly competitive, but strong. As I watch the economy crumbling around me, I occasionally ponder the demise of PPC advertising, but I just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to happen. PPC advertising is an incredibly powerful, proven and cost-effective medium for reaching targeted customers. Advertisers still need to reach their targeted audience and there is likely no more cost effective way to do so. </p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.jumpfly.com/profiles/brad-garlin.htm" title="Profile for Brad Garlin">Learn more about Brad</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=192&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/financial-crisis-and-internet-marketing-0192/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google News &#8211; Google Yahoo Deal Delay</title>
		<link>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-news-google-yahoo-deal-delay-0190</link>
		<comments>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-news-google-yahoo-deal-delay-0190#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brad Garlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Yahoo!-Partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC-News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!-Search-Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/google-news-google-yahoo-deal-delay-0190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amid growing concern, Google and Yahoo! both announced the planned Google &#8211; Yahoo! alliance will be delayed. Both companies released similar statements, with Google saying, &#8220;When we announced our advertising agreement with Yahoo in June we agreed to delay its implementation until October to give regulators time to look at the details. As we are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amid growing concern, Google and Yahoo! both announced the planned Google &#8211; Yahoo! alliance will be delayed. Both companies released similar statements, with Google saying, &#8220;When we announced our advertising agreement with Yahoo in June we agreed to delay its implementation until October to give regulators time to look at the details. As we are still in conversation with the Department of Justice we have agreed to a brief delay in implementing the agreement while those discussions <img border="0" vspace="5" align="right" width="200" src="http://www.jumpfly.com/images/Yahoogle-delay.jpg" hspace="5" alt="Google Yahoo Deal Delayed" height="200" style="width: 200px; height: 200px" title="Google Yahoo Deal Delayed" />continue.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is not too surprising based on the increasing opposition this deal continues to face on various fronts. I knew the anti-trust investigation was serious back in July when the <a target="_blank" href="http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/department-of-justice-investigates-planned-yahoo-google-partnership-0116" title="Department of Justice Investigation">Department of Justice contacted us here at JumpFly</a>. Some big organizations in opposition include the World Association of Newspapers, which represents over 18,000 newspapers, and the Association of National Advertisers (ANA), which represents over 400 companies and 9,000 brands (<a target="_blank" href="http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/internet-advertising-weekly-review-sept-19-2008-0176" title="Google News Video Review">view previous article and video about this</a>).</p>
<p>Looks to me like this deal is likely not going to ever happen. Google and Yahoo&#8217;s combined search market share would be a staggering 83%, a number that more and more parties are not comfortable with. The immediate loser that comes to mind here is Yahoo! as they stood to gain an additional $800 million per year in revenue from this deal. Ouch. However, this was a strange agreement anyway, where two arch- rivals were looking to work together. One winner here is Microsoft, who is hanging on to 8% share of the search market and trying to avoid elimination from the search engine marketing arena. They would love to see this deal permanently tabled. Time will tell, but for now, no deal.</p>
<p>More about <a target="_blank" href="http://www.jumpfly.com/profiles/brad-garlin.htm" title="Profile for Brad Garlin">Brad</a></p>
<p>Recent Google News:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://blog.jumpfly.com/public/item/google-news-recap-new-g1-phone-chrome-browser-stock-madness-and-more-0187" title="Google News Recap">Google News Recap &#8211; New G1 Phone, Chrome Browser, Stock Madness and More</a></p>
<img src="http://testblog.owt.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=190&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://testblog.owt.com/public/item/google-news-google-yahoo-deal-delay-0190/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

